Blog Archive

Search This Blog

Showing posts with label xmen. Show all posts
Showing posts with label xmen. Show all posts

Thursday, June 23, 2016

Quick Movie Review: X-Men: Apocalypse (2016)





X-Men story lines all pretty much revolve around the same theme: Humans fearing mutants and acting upon it irrationally, causing bad mutants to revolt and good mutants to attempt peace.

We start off in 3600 B.C., with set pieces that showcase ancient Egypt as good as any we've seen since maybe The Mummy in 1999. Here, the first mutant known to man, En Sabah Nur aka Apocalypse (though his name doesn't seem to really be important), gets betrayed and trapped underground for centuries. This dude would've given me nightmares if I saw him as a child.

Then we wind up in the 1980s, with some cool zeitgeists of the era. But not too much so that it becomes a nostalgia flick--though that wouldn't be too bad either. We catch up with our X-Men stars ten years after the events in X-Men First Class. We're introduced to a few new mutants and get most of our favorites back. Apocalypse gets awoken from his long sleep and decides to assemble a team to kill off humans--along with any mutant who stands in his way.

The film does a great job of balancing a cornucopia of character's story lines. Everyone is accounted for, but wisely, most of the villains aren't touched upon that much--including Apocalypse. Some may argue that he lacks a unique incentive, but when you're the most powerful mutant ever and thirst for omnipotence, what other incentive do you need? But it does go beyond that. His philosophy is Hitler-esque in that he wants to destroy who he believes to be inferior beings. And he's given a sort of false-charisma that makes the fact that he has followers believable.

The only other villain for which we get sufficient depth established is Magneto--perhaps the most compelling story in the whole X-Men saga--with only Wolverine's giving it a run for its money. Magneto walks the line between good and evil at times in the series, with his fantastic dynamic/friendship with Professor Xavier furthered upon even more in this film.

The action doesn't feel empty and neither does the plot. The characters are enjoyable and we don't feel cheated out of anyone's backstory. But we don't feel forced into one either. The good thing about having multiple movies and prequels is that we trust that, in time, we will know each character's origin.

X-Men: Apocalypse may not have the most radical of premises within the X-Men universe, but its a subject that is still treated with much realism and ongoingness--something other franchises don't do quite as well. The civil war battle thing has been a common theme among superhero movies this year, and X-Men does it best. Something of the grandest proportions is actually at stake. Heroes and civilization as a whole may actually be destroyed.

It all makes this a solid installment in the series and maybe the best superhero movie this year (so far). Plus, its plethora of characters and a creepy antagonist make the movie engaging and not feel quite as long as it is. We needed some redemption after the slap-in-the-face time travel entry, Days of Future Past, nullified the stories in a franchise we've grown to appreciate. That was more of a cool idea in the moment, while this movie is an important idea.

Oh, and we also get an esoteric post-credits scene, whose meaning will most likely be forgotten by the time the next film comes out anyway.

Twizard Rating: 94

Friday, May 30, 2014

Quick Movie Review: X-Men: Days of Future Past


I love the X-Men movies. They're probably my favorite superhero franchise. I love how it's less villain-based and more of an "us against them" theme, which in turn creates and drives the inner conflicts within the mutant world.  And this new installment is far from the exception. It was awesome--the special fx, the set pieces, the consistent pace, and the unique formula and storytelling. You can't really go wrong with time travel films because it's in their nature to not be formulaic.

However, unlike every other time travel movie where the character who travels back in time is the one who is developing throughout the course of events, that character in this film (Wolverine) is the only one NOT developing. I know that in the nature of the film it's "not important" that he develops, but I'd like to think that on a macro scale it is important. And as for the characters that DO develop, it doesn't even really matter (with maybe the exception of Mystique) because we've seen it all before. In fact, they spend several films arcing these characters into who they are before this movie. The actions in this film are just serving the plot--not the characters within it--since they all would have turned out fine anyway. I sure know that the audience didn't need to see Professor X and Magneto become who we've already seen them become. The filmmakers just relied on the character depth that they had already developed in the previous films. I'm not saying that Wolverine going back in time wasn't important, because it was necessary for the future of the mutant world. All I'm trying to say is that this plot didn't serve well for the progression of any of the characters within the movie because we've already seen where they end up and it's not too bad. Don't get me wrong, the characters definitely give you the ability to feel for them, it's just that in the long run, what about their character is at stake? But I guess we will see what happens with the future of this franchise and where they decide to go with it. You can't just help feeling that the conclusions of all the past X-Men films now become void and obsolete.

Now, although the plot is self-serving, it's still very entertaining and fairly original. I'm just saying that pretty much 100% of the issues in this film lie directly in it's inability to further its character's depths past where we've already seen them. We are simply just getting an origin to a story that we are unsure of now. 

Twizard Rating: 93